Tuesday, 29 September 2009

Revealed: Rover director's mysterious lover Qu Li's links to the Chinese firm that 'lifts and shifts' the British motor industry

By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 11:50 PM on 26th September 2009

Dr Qu Li with her father, who was a senior official at a Chinese car firm

Connections: Dr Qu Li with her father, who was a senior official at a Chinese car firm

Father and daughter stand side by side in front of an anonymous building. He smiles proudly for the camera while she looks awkward, demure and slightly embarrassed.

But this ordinary snapshot, taken a decade ago and never published before, raises new questions about the demise of Britain’s once-powerful car industry.

For the lady in the bright red anorak is Dr Qu Li, the mysterious and glamorous Chinese woman fixer who was paid £1.7million as a consultant to MG Rover at the same time as she was having an affair with Nick Stephenson, one of its directors.

But The Mail on Sunday can reveal that her father was for many years a senior official at the Chinese car firm that scooped up the historic British company’s discounted assets – including the rights to the famous MG sports car – in a so-called ‘lift and shift’ operation after the company collapsed.

The disclosure, which is missing from the recent 850-page Government report into the collapse of the former car giant, will prompt fresh concerns about Labour’s handling of the affair, which cost more than 6,000 UK jobs.

And it also casts doubts on the thoroughness of the Government’s subsequent official investigation, carried out by a top City accountant and a leading QC, which cost the taxpayer £16million.

The report, which took four years to produce, attempts to portray Dr Li as little more than a translator and questioned why she was paid so much for her 15 months’ work.

But in largely dismissing her importance, the report also glosses over how Dr Li – who associates claim was unusually granted dual British and Chinese passports – was able to move effortlessly in and out of China with the Rover executives as negotiations continued to find a Chinese partner to keep the UK plants going.

Last night, a source close to Dr Li even spoke of ‘strange forces at work’ trying to paint her as an agent provocateur.

MI5 has recently warned of the dangers posed by Chinese state-sponsored industrial espionage.

Today, Dr Li shares a sprawling £500,000 farmhouse in Studley, Worcestershire, with divorced John Killick, 51, a senior executive at Bentley.

Her supporters suggest smears against her could be motivated by her current role in negotiations to sell collapsed Midlands-based van maker LDV to China in another ‘lift and shift’ deal that will see manufacturing end in Britain.

Birmingham-based LDV, owned by oligarch Oleg Deripaska, a friend of Business Secretary Lord Mandelson, shut down last June after the Government refused to sanction loans to keep the plant open.

Dr Li

Well rewarded: Dr Li earned £1.7million for 15 months' work at Rover, working as a consultant

Dr Li is now reportedly negotiating a reputed £8million buy-out through the firm’s administrators on behalf of an unnamed Chinese car company.

Last week, in a carefully orchestrated interview with the Financial Times, Dr Li said she had been ‘stoned to death’ twice over, by the contents of the Rover report and the public scrutiny of her affair with one of the Rover directors.

‘If I was male, it would have been quite different,’ she said.

Now new details of Dr Li’s personal links to the Chinese firm that benefited from MG Rover’s collapse can be revealed.

Last night, Dr Li’s spokesman rejected any suggestion of a conflict of interest and said she had made no secret of her close connections to the Chinese car industry.

He added that she had been ‘fully committed to saving Rover as a British car maker’ and had been ‘devastated’ when it failed.

But questions remain. Dr Li was hired as a consultant as MG Rover tried, unsuccessfully, to negotiate a deal with the Chinese motor industry to save the 110-year-old car giant.

The Government’s damning report criticises the large fees paid to her and attacks MG Rover directors – the so-called Phoenix Four, who awarded themselves huge salaries while overseeing the firm’s demise in 2005.

The four – Stephenson, John Edwards, 57, Peter Beale, 54, and John Towers, 61, paid themselves nearly £36million during the five years they ran the company.

The report also reveals how Dr Li, 45, was having an ‘intimate relationship’ with MG Rover director Nick Stephenson, 61, who had hired her.

It goes into great detail about the affair between Dr Li and Stephenson, who earned almost £9million in salary and benefits during the five years he helped to run MG Rover.

But what the report does not say – nor will the Government or the investigators discuss the omission – is that Dr Qu Li is the daughter of one of the most influential managers behind Nanjing Automotive, the Chinese vehicle maker.

Nanjing purchased the assets of the defunct Rover Group from the official receiver for a knock-down price of £53million in 2006, reviving the MG sports car brand but moving most of the production to China.

The Nanjing company then hired Dr Li and her former lover Stephenson to advise them on the removal of the production lines from the Midlands car factories for reassembly in China.

The car firm, like its rivals throughout China, is ultimately controlled by the country’s Communist government, and its structure is not clear-cut.

Dr Qu Li pictured in November 1995

Bright: Dr Qu Li, pictured here in 1995, came to Britain in 1990 to study for a PhD at Leeds University

At the time it purchased MG Rover’s assets, the company boasted 14,000 employees at its plant in the city of Nanjing, 300 miles from Beijing. The Chinese plant had the capacity to produce 200,000 vehicles a year.

Shortly after the MG Rover purchase, the company was merged by government officials with the larger Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation, which had also been interested in bidding for the British company.

The Mail on Sunday has established that Dr Li’s father, named in China as Li Si-jiu and described locally as one of the Nanjing car company’s founders, for many years held the title of chief engineer.

Others describe him as a ‘company dignitary’ who was responsible for the growth and modernisation of the company and whose advice is still sought by the firm’s current management.

Dr Li’s mother is also said to have played a key role in the development of Nanjing’s car industry, heading the city’s welding institute.

Unlike their Western industry rivals, the Li family never grew wealthy on the firm’s success. Instead, they worked hard and for long hours for the good of the party, and now live on a company pension and in a company-provided flat.

One former close business associate said Dr Li had told him that her parents had been involved with the Nanjing car firm – which was set up in 1947 as a repair service for the East China Field Army, part of the Red Army – for more than 50 years.

But according to the long-time associate, China’s Cultural Revolution – which attempted to re-educate the nation’s middle classes – hit the family badly.

He said: ‘She told me how her parents were sent to work in the countryside by Communist officials and Qu Li, who would have been just three when the Cultural Revolution began in 1966, was taken away from them and selected for training for China’s Olympic diving team.

‘She told me she was injured and couldn’t continue but someone must have realised she was bright and they began to educate her.’

After ten years, the country’s despotic leader Chairman Mao, realising China’s industries were on the verge of collapse, abandoned the Cultural Revolution and the Lis returned to Nanjing to revitalise the ailing car plant.

Nick Stephenson

Affair: Nick Stephenson was one of the directors at MG Rover. He was part of the so-called Phoenix Four

Dr Li’s colleague added: ‘The regime realised it needed people like her father and their expertise and he was brought back to run the Nanjing business. Her mother was then brought back to run the welding institute at Nanjing.

‘They had to watch their step. People I met who fell foul of the regime would suddenly disappear. They were no longer mentioned by their former friends and it did not pay to ask what had become of them.’

He added: ‘But Qu told me she remained separated from her parents for years and was only reunited with them when she was aged around 18. Maybe that is why she is the driven individual she is today.’

The colleague said he was later introduced to Dr Li’s parents on a business trip with Qu Li to China.

He said: ‘Mr Li was a figurehead of the company, who was greatly revered.’

Dr Li will not discuss her family. Through her spokesman she dismissed it as ‘irrelevant’, although she says the Rover executives and the Government inspectors were aware of who they were.

And, while acknowledging she was trained as an Olympic diver and a gymnast, she casts doubt on some of the things her former colleagues say that she told them about her upbringing, including that the Communist regime had taken her from her mother and father.

'Dr Li acted vigorously and effectively on MG Rover’s behalf, securing £67million of investment that kept the plant going at one time.'

What is certain is that Dr Li did well enough in her studies in China that she was allowed to come to Britain in 1990 to study for her PhD at Leeds University.

Graduating in 1996, she dedicated her 450-page thesis on metallurgy – entitled ‘The effects of vanadium and nitrogen additions on the grain coarsening characteristics of titanium steels’ – to ‘my family and friends for their continuous encouragement and support through this work’.

One account suggests that to pay her way through university, she started working in a local restaurant.

But Dr Li told Government inspectors that she spent large periods of time helping Chinese firms negotiate joint ventures with Western firms.

By her own admission last week, she was, at one time, a Chinese government official.

She did not explain what her role for the Communist regime was, but what is clear is that her experience in business and as a Chinese official has proved useful.

‘Her contacts were second to none,’ said one Western businessman she had previously helped do deals in China.

‘Wherever you went with her, everything was laid on. She always knew the right official to see to make sure everything went smoothly.’

So why the Government’s highly-paid inspectors chose to focus so much of their efforts on Dr Li’s affair with Phoenix director Mr Stephenson is unclear.

Dr Li told them there was intimacy on an ‘intermittent’ basis over maybe ‘a couple of months’.

Mr Stephenson said the relationship started in early 2004 but was ‘dead and buried probably – towards the end of that year’.

One witness told the department’s investigators: ‘When she was in China in the early part of 2005, there was “lots of speculation” about the relationship between Dr Li and Mr Stephenson’.

The report added: ‘It is, perhaps, also noteworthy that the relationship was such that MG Rover engineers observed the closeness of the two on a trip to China in, probably, the second half of 2004.’

Dr Li last week said she was ‘shocked and shaken’ by the ‘inappropriate’ interest the inspectors had shown in her sex life during a two-day evidence session.

‘I feel that I was stoned to death for three years by the Government inspectors,’ she said last week.

At the time of their affair, Mr Stephenson was divorced and Dr Li says she was in a long-term relationship with another man. She described the relationship as a ‘very private issue’ between herself and Mr Stephenson.

She added: ‘When you are working intensively on a deal – and I was in China for 180 days negotiating – all the team members try to support each other. Maybe sometimes the support went slightly beyond the boundaries. But as far as I am concerned, this was not a relationship.’

Last night, a spokesman for Dr Li said she had never made a secret of her family association with the Chinese car industry but said that she had been hired by MG Rover and at all times worked for the firm’s benefit.

He said: ‘It has never been a secret that Dr Li belongs to family steeped in the automotive industry. Her father was chief engineer at Nanjing, although he retired 15 years ago.

‘Dr Li had no commercial interest, directly or indirectly, in Nanjing while she worked for MG Rover.

‘The MG Rover directors knew of her background and credentials – that’s exactly why they employed her to act for them. The Government inspectors were also aware, from oral and written evidence to them, of her background and expertise.

‘Dr Li acted vigorously and effectively on MG Rover’s behalf, securing £67million of investment that kept the plant going at one time.

‘No one was more bitterly disappointed when that joint venture [with the Chinese car giant the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation] did not materialise and MG Rover collapsed.’

A spokesman for one of the report’s authors, Gervase MacGregor, a forensic accountant at BDO Stoy Hayward, said: ‘The MG Rover investigation was fair and conducted with the highest degree of integrity. All information disclosed to the inspectors was carefully considered in the preparation of their report.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Business said: ‘These allegations cannot hide the evidence which the inspectors uncovered and which is set out clearly in the report.

‘This includes evidence that the directors took “unreasonably large financial rewards” for themselves, evidence that MPs had been given “inaccurate and misleading explanations” for what had been going on, evidence that software was bought designed to wipe computer records after the enquiry was launched.

‘The inspectors were also critical of the fact that the group paid Dr Li amounts that were much too high but they did not find that Dr Li’s actions directly contributed to the failure to find a joint venture partner for Rover.

‘Directors are responsible for running companies and taking decisions. Whatever advice the directors were given, they were responsible for the decisions they took.’

Additional reporting: Andrew Young and Hazel Parry in Hong Kong

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

Don't eat near Ramadan fasters, Home Office staff told


By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 10:00 PM on 19th September 2009

Home Office staff were officially warned not to eat in front of their fasting Muslim colleagues during Ramadan – in case it made them feel hungry.

The advice came in a taxpayer-funded internal document listing do’s and don’ts during the Muslim holy month, which ends this weekend.

But the guide is now at the centre of a row with Islamic groups who said it was more likely to incite hatred of Muslims than promote understanding.

Muslims wait to break their fast at end of holy month Ramadan

Fasting: During the holy month, devout Muslims do not drink or eat from dawn until sunset and must avoid 'all obscene and irreligious sights and sounds'

The Home Office Islamic Network produced the five-page information sheet which says: ‘In practical terms, please be sensitive when eating lunch near a Muslim colleague who is fasting.

This can make an individual feel hungrier and make it more challenging to observe the fast.’

During the holy month devout Muslims do not drink or eat from dawn until sunset and, according to the document, must avoid ‘all obscene and irreligious sights and sounds’.

It also urged Home Office managers to be flexible over working arrangements.


It says: ‘The most likely need Muslim staff may present to managers during this period is for flexibility around working hours and break times as those fasting will have a slightly different routine from usual. Managers and Muslim staff should discuss what their needs are and be responsive and sensitive.’

Managers were also told: ‘Muslim staff who are fasting and whose environment allows it may wish to set out for work earlier than usual and finish their working day correspondingly early...in line with flexi-time arrangements.’

Last night a Home Office spokeswoman confirmed the document had been distributed to its staff and posted on the department’s internal intranet system.

She said: ‘It is not formal departmental guidance and was written by volunteers.’

The spokeswoman added that the Islamic Network was one of a number of staff faith and equality groups within the Home Office and was paid for by the taxpayer.

The Muslim Public Affairs Committee, which claims to be fighting a ‘political jihad against Islamophobia’, attacked the document.

It said: ‘It is designed to create more hatred in the hearts of non-Muslims.

‘We don’t care how much non-Muslims eat in front of us.

'It’s never been an issue and never will be and we have never asked for any special treatment or sensitivity from non-Muslims whilst fasting.’

Minister lands top job with French power firm - just a year after giving it the go-ahead to take over British nuclear plants


By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 2:55 AM on 13th September 2009

Energy talks: John Hutton

Energy talks: John Hutton

The Cabinet Minister behind a £12.5billion nuclear power deal with French-owned energy giant EDF is set to take a highly-paid job with the firm.

’s proposed move comes just a year after the former Business Secretary gave the go-ahead for the firm to buy many of Britain’s existing and future nuclear power plants.

It is bound to raise new questions about the so-called ‘revolving door’ which allows Ministers to quit and take up lucrative jobs with firms they helped while in Government.

The energy deal saw EDF – which is controlled by the French government – take over British Energy and its eight UK nuclear power stations.

It also gave the firm control of most of the sites earmarked for building new nuclear power stations in Britain, including Sizewell in Suffolk and Dungeness in Kent.

Now EDF, the world’s largest energy firm, wants Mr Hutton, who resigned from the Cabinet in June, to take ona role advising the firm on ‘key strategic issues’.

His appointment will first need to be approved by the independent , which advises the Prime Minister.

But while the committee can impose restrictions on senior Government officials and Ministers taking up jobs in the private sector, it rarely prevents their appointment.

Mr Hutton was Business Secretary from 2007 until October last year, when he became Secretary of State for Defence, and was seen as the main architect of the EDF deal and the plans for a new British nuclear power plant building programme.

When the EDF deal threatened to falter, with investors holding out for a higher price for their shares, he personally intervened, telling shareholders:

‘I am disappointed that talks between British Energy and EDF have not yet been successful. We thought it was a good deal and we were ready to accept.’

He has also advocated that Britain should concentrate on securing its future energy needs before dealing with climate change.

EDF has made no secret that it plans to use its acquisition of British Energy as a platform to build at least four nuclear reactors in Britain.

It is expected Mr Hutton will be appointed to EDF’s Stakeholder Advisory Panel, which advises the firm’s senior management, and includes Lord Patten, the former Tory Cabinet Minister and last Governor of Hong Kong.

If his move goes ahead, Mr Hutton will join a steady stream of former senior Labour colleagues taking highly paid jobs in the private sector, such as former Trade and Health Secretary , former Home Secretary and ex-Defence Minister Ivor Caplin.

Last night a spokesman for EDF confirmed it was in discussions with John Hutton. He added: ‘Nothing has been concluded at this stage.’

EDF refused to say how much Mr Hutton would be paid for the new role.

Revealed: The first picture of mysterious Dr Li, the £1.6m lover of shamed Rover boss


By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 12:49 AM on 13th September 2009

This is the first picture of the mysterious Chinese woman at the centre of the collapse of MG Rover.

Dr Qu Li was paid more than £1.6million as a consultant by the British car firm – at the same time as she was having an affair with one of its directors.

Dr Qu Li of China Ventures Ltd

Dr Qu Li was paid £1.69 million GBP for her services at MG Rover

Her company website boasts of its expertise in global acquisitions, business planning and contract negotiation.

But a damning 850-page Government report criticises the large fees paid to her and attacks MG Rover directors, who awarded themselves huge salaries while overseeing the firm’s demise in 2005.

The report also reveals how Dr Li, 45, was having an ‘intimate relationship’ with MG Rover director Nick Stephenson, 61.

The consultant was paid for just 15 months of work as MG Rover tried, unsuccessfully, to negotiate a business deal with the Chinese motor industry to save the 110-year-old car giant. In the end it went bust with the loss of 6,300 jobs.

The Government’s report goes into great detail about the affair between Dr Li and Stephenson, who earned almost £9million in wages and benefits during the five years he helped to run MG Rover.

The report attacks the so-called Phoenix Four for the way they managed MG Rover. They took over the ailing car firm in a dramatic rescue bid in 2000.

The four directors – Stephenson, John Edwards, 57, Peter Beale, 54, and John Towers, 61, paid themselves nearly £36million during the five years they ran the company.

According to the report from the Business Department, Dr Li – who lives in a sprawling farmhouse in Studley, Worcestershire – and Mr Stephenson had tried to play down their relationship.

Dr Qu Li's house at Common Farm, Studley, Worcestershire, UK

Dr Li was allegedly in a relationship with Mr Stephenson a director of Phoenix Ventures

While Dr Li claimed there was intimacy on an ‘intermittent’ basis over maybe ‘a couple of months’, Mr Stephenson said the relationship started in early 2004, but was ‘dead and buried – probably – towards the end of that year’.

Dr Li and Stephenson played a key role in the negotiations with Chinese businesses and regularly travelled to together.

Nick Stephenson

Nick Stephenson was allegedly having an ‘intimate relationship’ with Li

One witness told the department’s investigators ‘when she was in China in the early part of 2005 there was “lots of speculation” about the relationship between Dr Li and Mr Stephenson’.

The report added: ‘It is, perhaps, also noteworthy that the relationship was such that MG Rover engineers observed the closeness of the two on a trip to China in, probably, the second half of 2004.’

The Business Department questioned why Dr Li had been paid such large sums for her role.

The report says there was no attempt to find out the market rate for such services or whether anyone else could have done the job, concluding: ‘Our own view is that the sums which the group paid... were... much too high.’

Secret files reveal Prince’s diplomat pal ‘is a KGB spy’


By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 1:27 AM on 16th August 2009

A high-profile foreign ambassador could be expelled from Britain after it was revealed that top secret intelligence files suggest he is a KGB spy.

Kairat Abusseitov, ’s attache to , is already at the centre of cash-for-lobbying claims surrounding Prince Andrew and multi-million-pound oil deals in the former Soviet republic.

Now evidence passed to The Mail on Sunday suggests he has been a KGB agent for 20 years.

KGB

Honour: Mr Abusseitov is formally welcomed by the Queen

Last night, a senior member of the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee called for the Foreign Office to investigate the claims.

Mr Abusseitov has met the Queen, holds discussions with senior Ministers and has been involved in confidential United Nations discussions on terrorism and nuclear weapons.

But according to the secret files, he was recruited by the KGB in 1988 as a spy and is codenamed ‘Delano’.

Part of a 175-page file, obtained from former Soviet intelligence archives, reveals details of his alleged career as an agent.

The revelation is the latest controversy to hit Britain’s relations with Kazakhstan and the role of Prince Andrew, the Foreign Office’s Special Representative for International Trade and Investment.

Mr Abusseitov is honorary president of the British Kazakh Society and Prince Andrew is its honorary patron.

Both regularly attend its events. The society also brings the ambassador into regular contact with some of Britain’s most powerful companies, including defence firm BAE Systems.

But a KGB report, written in 1992, says: ‘Kairat Khuatovich Abusseitov served as an agent of Republic of Kazakhstan KGB Intelligence Department during the period June 1988 till May 1992...’

Discussing Mr Abusseitov’s future suitability as an agent abroad, the report’s author, Major A.V.Efimov, of the KGB’s First Criminal Investigative Department, says: ‘He has the chance of going abroad as a member of the Centre of Strategic Research’s delegations, and his perfect knowledge of English allows him contact with those foreigners who interest the KGB.’

Major Efimov then recommends: ‘Appointing Abusseitov as a part-time servant of Kazakhstan KGB First Intelligence Department, with a monthly reward of 700 roubles.’

Former Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell, a member of the Commons Foreign Affairs and the Intelligence and Security committees, said: ‘If there is any question he has gone beyond purely diplomatic behaviour then it is for the Foreign Office to determine if he should be [declared] persona non grata.’

Last night, Ambassador Abusseitov confirmed he had regular contact with the KGB during the Eighties and Nineties – and with Major Efimov – but said: ‘I was never his agent and I was never paid by the KGB. I was not a spy for him or anyone else
in the KGB and I was never paid by them.’

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

MoD chiefs 'blew £150m on wrong trucks' for

By Jason Lewis and William Lowther
Last updated at 8:15 AM on 12th July 2009

The vehicle chosen by the Ministry of Defence to replace the controversial Snatch Land Rover - in which 37 British soldiers have been killed by roadside bombs in and Afghanistan - was rejected by the U.S. Army after it allegedly failed explosive 'survivability' tests.

The U.S. tests - to determine whether troops inside would survive if the vehicle were hit by a roadside bomb - were carried out just weeks before the ordered 262 of the all-terrain vehicles for use in Afghanistan.

Christened the Husky by the British military, the vehicle is due to take over much of the work of the lightly armoured Snatch Land Rover, which has been widely criticised as giving insufficient protection to soldiers.

Enlarge Husky graphic

Husky graphic

The £600,000 Husky will be used by patrols in Helmand province. But the has now ordered another armoured off-roader, the Oshkosh M-ATV, which has a V-shaped hull designed to deflect explosions - and costs only £300,000, half as much as the Husky. The cost difference is partly due to the U.S. military buying 2,000 vehicles.

Senior Opposition MPs have now questioned why the Ministry of Defence was buying equipment rejected by our closest allies.

Former Army officer Patrick Mercer, chairman of the Commons sub-committee on counter-terrorism, said: 'If this vehicle is not good enough for the Americans, why should it be good enough for our men?

'The Husky is meant to be the solution to our troops dying in roadside bomb attacks. But if it is not good enough, then it does not make sense to persist with trying to acquire it. Surely the MoD can see that if American trials have found it wanting, then ours should as well.'

The Husky, which can carry a crew of four, is built to navigate rough terrain while 'offering added protection from ballistics fire, mines and roadside bombs'. It is due to be deployed in Afghanistan before the end of the year.

Details of its armour and other defensive systems are secret, but it is 'similar' to the vehicle that was sent to the U.S. Army testing grounds last February as part of the competition for a £600million Pentagon contract for an all-terrain vehicle for its troops in Afghanistan.

Both the test vehicle and the version ordered by the MoD are based on Navistar's International MXT, the largest production pick-up truck, which was originally designed for the American commercial market.

Immediately after the explosives tests, the vehicle's manufacturer, Illinois-based Navistar Defense, was told it was out of the running for the U.S. contract. Both the Pentagon and Navistar refuse to say why the vehicle - described as 'the Husky's cousin' - was ruled out. But it seems clear that it had failed the tests.

The decision was followed by a huge behind-the-scenes row between Navistar and the Pentagon over what was meant by a 'hull breach'.

The U.S. Department of Defence was forced to define a 'hull breach' in the vehicle's contract as 'any design or material failure that allows lethal mechanisms, such as blast overpressure, smoke, secondary debris, fragments, or fire to enter the crew volume'. In other words, any failure of the vehicle that could lead to the soldiers inside being killed or maimed by a roadside bomb.

Despite the row, Britain went ahead and signed a £150million contract to replace the Snatch Land Rover with a vehicle similar to the one tested and rejected by the Americans.

The MoD describes the Husky as 'an excellent piece of kit', adding: 'Our personnel are very excited about getting it in theatre.'

A spokeswoman for the MoD claimed the Husky was different from the vehicle at the centre of the 'hull breach' row.

She said: 'We strongly reject the suggestion that the vehicle [tested by the Americans] and the Husky purchased by the MoD are the same vehicle. They are not. We are adamant that the protection issues you raise [with the Americans] cannot be read across to Husky. They are very different vehicles and Husky has passed our strict protection tests.'

Richard North, defence expert and author of The Ministry Of Defeat, a critique of the MoD's decisions in Iraq, said the vehicle tested by the Americans and the Husky were identical 'except for a few bolt-ons'.

'To call it a different vehicle is weasel words,' he said. 'Its core protective cell is the same. The Oshkosh, which has been selected by the Americans, is higher off the ground, is a heavier vehicle and has a deep, V-shaped hull, which is critical. The angle of the V is what gives protection from explosives.

'The Husky has an inclined plate on the edge of the crew compartment, but basically the hull is flat.

'It is this shape that is crucial. You can't stop an explosion - you have to try to deflect it. We are paying £600,000 for each Husky, while the Americans are paying £300,000 for the better vehicle. The question is: Why?'

Before the U.S. explosives tests last February, Navistar had confirmed it was 'fielding a similar vehicle' to the Husky.

A Navistar statement at the time said: 'While the company competes to provide the U.S. military with vehicles specially designed for Afghanistan, Navistar is fielding a similar vehicle with the for the same mission purpose in Afghanistan. As part of the United Kingdom's Tactical Support Vehicle program, Navistar's vehicle will be called the Husky.'

Last night, a Navistar spokeswoman said: 'The vehicle [tested by the U.S. Army] and the Husky share the same platform or chassis, and that is why the company calls the two vehicles cousins and says they are similar.

'Since February, a lot of changes have taken place and the Husky is now a brand new vehicle. From the platform up, it is completely different.

'The survivability solutions built into the Husky are specially designed. The British Ministry of Defence has asked U.S. not to reveal details.'

She added that the company had never commented on the U.S. testing of its vehicle and 'will not do so now'.

The revelation comes as families of troops killed in Snatch Land Rovers, which were designed for patrolling the streets of , are demanding an inquiry into the use of the vehicle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Last week, a High Court judge granted them a judicial review of the Government's refusal to hold a public inquiry.

MoD troop carriers are U.S. rejects... and '1 in 10' of our soldiers could die in Afghanistan

By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 2:52 PM on 12th July 2009

New vehicles purchased to protect British troops in have already been rejected as unsafe by the US military.

The vehicles failed basic 'survivability' tests, which showed soldiers would be left vulnerable to roadside bombs, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

But although the rejected them, the Ministry of Defence has ordered 262 to replace the controversial Snatch Land Rovers.

In contrast, the Americans have now ordered a more robust model - at half the £600,000 cost of the vehicle the British have dubbed the 'Husky'.

The disclosure, at the end of the blackest week for British forces in Afghanistan, came as responded to growing anger over the death toll by promising to improve troops' equipment.

Enlarge

A British soldier from 3 SCOTS patrols a Taliban-held area of Afghanistan's Helmand province during Operation Panther's Claw

Two of the soldiers who lost their lives in the most recent attacks were named last night as Rifleman Daniel Hume, 22, of 4th Battalion, The Rifles, and Private John Brackpool of Prince of ' Company, 1st Battalion Welsh Guards, who would have celebrated his 28th birthday yesterday.

A total of 15 British troops have died in just ten days in southern Afghanistan as they continue Operation Panther's Claw, a major assault against the Taliban.

The deaths have sparked a reassessment of strategy and housands more troops could be sent to Afghanistan within months.

The Ministry of Defence is considering a troop surge in the wake of criticism that British forces in Afghanistan are understaffed and ill-equipped.

President said: 'My heart goes out to those British soldiers. We knew this summer was going to be tough fighting.'

But MPs, shocked by the scale of the carnage, have been warned that the situation could get even worse.

A senior member of the Commons defence committee told The Mail on Sunday that up to one in ten British frontline troops could lose their lives if the violence continues at its current intensity.

Enlarge Navistar MXT-MVA

Unsafe: The 'Husky' failed basic survivability tests showing soldiers would be vulnerable to roadside bombs

Enlarge

How the British and American trucks measure up

He said: 'I've been told they fear a ten per cent attrition rate in one regiment - that's deaths, not injuries. That will take some dealing with. We're talking about hundreds of deaths. We are in a quite scary situation.'

The shocking forecast came after the total number of deaths in Afghanistan rose to 184, exceeding the death toll in .

One MP predicted that Mr Brown would face huge pressure to reconsider the UK's commitment to Afghanistan if the violence did not abate by the end of August.

'If it doesn't work and we're still having this level of attrition by the time of the Afghan elections, then the demands for a radical rethink will grow,' the Labour backbencher said.

'Publicly, everyone will back the British involvement for now and stay faithful to the UK commitment, especially over this weekend and the terrible casualty news for our boys over there.'

The death rate MPs were warned to expect among the Welsh Guards - the regiment at the forefront of the increasingly vicious conflict with the Taliban - is on a par with that of British Empire troops during the First World War, and a huge increase in the current rate in Afghanistan of one in 36 over a six-month tour.

Enlarge

Downtime: Soldiers from 3 Scots relax after operations yesterday

Foreign Secretary sought to stiffen resolve by insisting that the fighting in Afghanistan was key to ensuring the security of the UK.

He also dismissed calls for British forces to withdraw, saying they were stopping Afghanistan becoming 'a launch-pad for attacks' by terrorists intent on targeting the UK. 'This is about the future of Britain,' he said.

He rejected claims from Tory leader that those fighting on the front line were not properly equipped, particularly with helicopters.

The row comesw as it is revealed that the vehicle chosen by the Ministry of Defence to replace the controversial Snatch Land Rover - in which 37 British soldiers have been killed by roadside bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan - was rejected by the U.S. Army after it allegedly failed explosive 'survivability' tests.

The U.S. tests - to determine whether troops inside would survive if the vehicle were hit by a roadside bomb - were carried out just weeks before the ordered 262 of the all-terrain vehicles for use in Afghanistan.

Christened the Husky by the British military, the vehicle is due to take over much of the work of the lightly armoured Snatch Land Rover, which has been widely criticised as giving insufficient protection to soldiers.

Gold standard: The Cougar Mastiff has been a success in Afghanistan

Enlarge

British troops have faced heavy fighting during the Panther's Claw operation, a bid to clear out Taliban-held areas north of the provincial capital Lashkar Gah

The £600,000 Husky will be used by patrols in Helmand province. But the Pentagon has now ordered another armoured off-roader, the Oshkosh M-ATV, which has a V-shaped hull designed to deflect explosions - and costs only £300,000, half as much as the Husky. The cost difference is partly due to the U.S. military buying 2,000 vehicles.

Senior Opposition MPs have now questioned why the Ministry of Defence was buying equipment rejected by our closest allies.

Former Army officer Patrick Mercer, chairman of the Commons sub-committee on counter-terrorism, said: 'If this vehicle is not good enough for the Americans, why should it be good enough for our men?

'The Husky is meant to be the solution to our troops dying in roadside bomb attacks. But if it is not good enough, then it does not make sense to persist with trying to acquire it. Surely the MoD can see that if American trials have found it wanting, then ours should as well.'

The Husky, which can carry a crew of four, is built to navigate rough terrain while 'offering added protection from ballistics fire, mines and roadside bombs'. It is due to be deployed in Afghanistan before the end of the year.

Details of its armour and other defensive systems are secret, but it is 'similar' to the vehicle that was sent to the U.S. Army testing grounds last February as part of the competition for a £600million Pentagon contract for an all-terrain vehicle for its troops in Afghanistan.

Enlarge

British soldiers secure a Taliban compound yesterday

Both the test vehicle and the version ordered by the MoD are based on Navistar's International MXT, the largest production pick-up truck, which was originally designed for the American commercial market.

Immediately after the explosives tests, the vehicle's manufacturer, Illinois-based Navistar Defense, was told it was out of the running for the U.S. contract.

Both the Pentagon and Navistar refuse to say why the vehicle - described as 'the Husky's cousin' - was ruled out. But it seems clear that it had failed the tests.

The decision was followed by a huge behind-the-scenes row between Navistar and the Pentagon over what was meant by a 'hull breach'.

The U.S. Department of Defence was forced to define a 'hull breach' in the vehicle's contract as 'any design or material failure that allows lethal mechanisms, such as blast overpressure, smoke, secondary debris, fragments, or fire to enter the crew volume'.

In other words, any failure of the vehicle that could lead to the soldiers inside being killed or maimed by a roadside bomb.

Despite the row, Britain went ahead and signed a £150million contract to replace the Snatch Land Rover with a vehicle similar to the one tested and rejected by the Americans.

Enlarge

Private John Brackpool of the Prince of Wales' Company, 1st Battalion Welsh Guards who was killed in Afghanistan on July 9

The MoD describes the Husky as 'an excellent piece of kit', adding: 'Our personnel are very excited about getting it in theatre.'

A spokeswoman for the MoD claimed the Husky was different from the vehicle at the centre of the 'hull breach' row.

She said: 'We strongly reject the suggestion that the vehicle [tested by the Americans] and the Husky purchased by the MoD are the same vehicle. They are not.

'We are adamant that the protection issues you raise [with the Americans] cannot be read across to Husky. They are very different vehicles and Husky has passed our strict protection tests.'

Richard North, defence expert and author of The Ministry Of Defeat, a critique of the MoD's decisions in Iraq, said the vehicle tested by the Americans and the Husky were identical 'except for a few bolt-ons'.

'To call it a different vehicle is weasel words,' he said. 'Its core protective cell is the same. The Oshkosh, which has been selected by the Americans, is higher off the ground, is a heavier vehicle and has a deep, V-shaped hull, which is critical. The angle of the V is what gives protection from explosives.

'The Husky has an inclined plate on the edge of the crew compartment, but basically the hull is flat.

'It is this shape that is crucial. You can't stop an explosion - you have to try to deflect it. We are paying £600,000 for each Husky, while the Americans are paying £300,000 for the better vehicle. The question is: Why?'

Enlarge

U.S. Marines with the 2nd Marine Expeditionary Brigade, RCT 2nd Battalion 8th Marines Echo Co. aim their weapons during a patrol on July 11, 2009 in Mian Poshteh

Before the U.S. explosives tests last February, Navistar had confirmed it was 'fielding a similar vehicle' to the Husky.

A Navistar statement at the time said: 'While the company competes to provide the U.S. military with vehicles specially designed for Afghanistan, Navistar is fielding a similar vehicle with the for the same mission purpose in Afghanistan. As part of the United Kingdom's Tactical Support Vehicle program, Navistar's vehicle will be called the Husky.'

Last night, a Navistar spokeswoman said: 'The vehicle [tested by the U.S. Army] and the Husky share the same platform or chassis, and that is why the company calls the two vehicles cousins and says they are similar.

'Since February, a lot of changes have taken place and the Husky is now a brand new vehicle. From the platform up, it is completely different.

'The survivability solutions built into the Husky are specially designed. The British Ministry of Defence has asked U.S. not to reveal details.'

Enlarge

The Pinzgauer Vector was bought at a cost of £150 million but the trucks were withdrawn after five soldier were killed in them

She added that the company had never commented on the U.S. testing of its vehicle and 'will not do so now'.

According to Mr North, the MoD first tried to replace the Snatch Land Rover in 2006 with a larger vehicle called the Pinzgauer Vector.

Just under 200 were bought at a cost of nearly £100 million. Earlier this year, they were all withdrawn because they could not protect against mines and roadside bombs.

The vehicle's light armour would only protect against a few grams of explosive, while its design positioned the driver and commander over the front wheels where they would catch the full force of any explosion.

Five soldiers died before the vehicle was withdrawn.

Amazingly, the MoD was forced to revert back to Land Rovers to fill the gap left by the vector, spending an additional £5million adding more armour in an effort to make them safer.

Mr North said: 'Rarely in the history of land warfare can there be an example of an armoured vehicle being replaced by the very vehicle that it was supposed to replace.'
He added: 'What is an even greater scandal though is that the MoD seems to have learned no lessons.

'Already, the Ministry has ordered a replacement called the Husky. But, instead of producing a purpose-made vehicle, like the mine-protected Mastiff which is now in service, it has, incredibly, opted for an American-made civilian Sports Utility Vehicle.

'Launched on the US market in 2004, it was described by its manufacturers as a "sleek and dominant truck geared for the image truck market, a growing niche of truck owners who want to make a powerful statement about who they are".'

The revelations come as families of troops killed in Snatch Land Rovers, which were designed for patrolling the streets of , are demanding an inquiry into the use of the vehicle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Last week, a High Court judge granted them a judicial review of the Government's refusal to hold a public inquiry.

Tuesday, 7 July 2009

MI6

MI6 chief blows cover on Facebook


Wife's account reveals family holidays showbiz friends and links to David Irving



ByJason Lewis
Last updated at 7:14 PM on 05th July 2009



Sir John Sawers pictured on his wife's Facebook page The new head of MI6 has been left exposed by a major personal security breach after his wife published intimate photographs and family details on the Facebook website.
Sir John Sawers is due to take over as chief of the Secret Intelligence Service in November, putting him in charge of all Britain's spying operations abroad.

But his wife's entries on the social networking site have exposed potentially compromising details about where they live and work, who their friends are and where they spend their holidays.
Amazingly, she had put virtually no privacy protection on her account, making it visible to any of the site's 200million users who chose to be in the open-access 'London' network - regardless of where in the world they actually were.
There are fears that the hugely embarrassing blunder may have compromised the safety of Sir John's family and friends.
Lady Shelley Sawers' extraordinary lapse exposed the couple's friendships with senior diplomats and well-known actors, including Moir Leslie, who plays a leading character in The Archers. And it revealed that the intelligence chief's brother-in-law - who holidayed with him last month - is an associate of the controversial Right-wing historian David Irving.
Immediately after The Mail on Sunday alerted the Foreign Office to the astonishing misjudgment, all trace of the material – which could potentially be useful to hostile foreign powers or terrorists - was removed from the internet.
The move suggests that MI6 or the Foreign Office, which is also responsible for the GCHQ electronic eavesdropping centre in Cheltenham, had not vetted what sort of information Sir John and his family were distributing over the internet.


Sir John Sawers Facebook pictures


Nor does it appear that the new intelligence chief - who will be codenamed 'C' once he takes up his
post - had considered the potential risks of what his family was revealing to the world.
Foreign Office staff are warned about their use of social networking sites when they join the department but MI6 expects its agents to maintain an even tighter secrecy, telling them not to reveal their true role to all but
their closest family.
Sir John Sawers, currently Britain's Ambassador to the United Nations, where he sits on the highly sensitive Security Council, began his working life in MI6 but has spent the past 20 years building a career
as a diplomat rather than a spy.
Senior politicians said the security lapse raised serious doubts about Sir John's suitability to head the intelligence service - and raised questions over whether an outsider should have been appointed to such a sensitive role.

Sir John Sawers Facebook pictures
Despite the security implications, Lady Sawers revealed on Facebook the location of the London flat used by the couple and the whereabouts of their three children and of Sir John's parents.
On June 16, the very day Sir John's MI6 appointment was announced, she posted 19 pictures of the couple on holiday with their friends in the West Country earlier that month.
The following day, she added a further 26 pictures, including one of Sir John playing on the beach in his swimming trucks, posing with his wife and children and chatting with friends and his mother.
Among those who joined the Sawers on the break were actors Moir Leslie, who plays both Sophie Barlow and vicar Janet Fisher in Radio 4 soap opera The Archers, and Alister Cameron, a character actor who has appeared on The Bill and Footballers' Wives.
Lady Sawers' Facebook 'friends' have also used the account to send messages of congratulations to Sir John on his new job, with one relative joking that he will now be known as 'Uncle C'.

Sir John Sawers Facebook pictures

On the day his appointment was announced, she wrote: 'Congrats on the new job, already dubbed Sir Uncle "C" by nephews in the know!'
Over the past year, Lady Sawers has been regularly updating anyone who cared to read her page - which could be found via internet search engines - on everything from family parties and holidays to the health of their pets and her views on the crisis in the Congo.
She also posted 22 photographs from Sir John's mother's 80th birthday party, showing the future spy chief with his closest friends and extended family, including his 86-year-old father, his two sons, aged 25 and 24, their girlfriends, and the couple's daughter Corinne, 22, a recent Oxford University graduate who is now an aspiring actress.
Corinne recently began touring with Jenny Seagrove in the play Pack Of Lies, coincidentally about a middle-class household suddenly at the centre of an espionage drama when an MI5 spy turns up at their house.
Among those featured in family photographs on the website is Lady Sawers' half-brother Hugo Haig-Thomas, a former diplomat.
Lady Sawers met her husband after visiting her brother when he was posted to Yemen in the late Seventies.
She liked the country and decided to stay, landing a secretarial job at the Embassy, where Sir John later succeeded Mr Haig-Thomas.
Mr Haig-Thomas is an associate and researcher for revisionist historian David Irving, who was jailed for three years in Austria in 2006 for 'glorifying the Nazi Party' because he questioned whether the Holocaust
took place.
The historian describes Haig-Thomas as 'a researcher who has done fine work for me'. His work includes examining the papers relating to the capture of Heinrich Himmler, the man behind Hitler's plan to exterminate the European Jews.
A recent post by Mr Haig-Thomas on Irving's website includes a translation of the testimony of a German officer who claimed to have built fake gas chambers at Sachsenhausen concentration camp on Soviet orders.
But Mr Haig-Thomas said he had never considered his views controversial, nor did he regret his connection with Irving.
He said: 'We are not close friends. I am interested in history,particularly German history, and I was engaged to carry out researchfor Irving. I have also attended several of his talks, but I do notnecessarily share his views.
'In my experience, the Foreign Office are very sensible about these things and will see that our connection does not amount to much.'
Edward Davy, the Liberal Democrat Foreign Affairs spokesman, called on Gordon Brown to launch an inquiry into whether the Facebook disclosures had compromised Sir John's ability to take up his MI6 post.
He said: 'Normally, I would welcome greater openness in Government for officials or politicians but this
type of exposure verges on the reckless.


Sir John Sawers Facebook pictures / David Irving website picture


'The Prime Minister should immediately commission an internal inquiry as to whether this has breached the security of the incoming head of MI6 too seriously to allow him to take up the post.'
And Conservative MP Patrick Mercer, an adviser to Government Security Minister Lord West, said the
MI6 chief had left himself open to blackmail.
He said: 'Sir John Sawers is in a very sensitive position and by revealing this sort of material his family have left him open to criticism and blackmail.
'As a long-serving diplomat and ambassador, his whole family have been involved in his line of business for decades. I would have hoped they would have been much more sensitive to potential security compromises like this.'
The Foreign Office refused to discuss the affair and declined to answer questions, including whether the department warned Ambassadors and other staff about social networking sites; whether the details Sir John's family published on the internet had come up in security checks before he was appointed as head of MI6; and whether he had made officials aware of his brother-in-law's links to David Irving.
But Foreign Secretary David Miliband today dismissed allegations of recklessness.
He told BBC1’s Andrew Marr Show: 'It is not a state secret that he wears Speedo swimming trunks.'
He added: ‘He was appointed 10 days ago to be the head of MI6; he’s an outstanding professional who will do a really good job in an outstanding organisation that does a huge amount for this country'







Tuesday, 9 June 2009

Alive and Tweeting...the spy who nearly died in coma mystery

Alive and Tweeting...the spy who nearly died in coma mystery

By Jason Lewis

Last updated at 10:04 PM on 06th June 2009

Looking tired, his hair thinner and a shade greyer, this is Alex Allan, Britain’s intelligence chief – a year after he was struck by a life-threatening illness which led to fears he was the victim of an assassination plot.

Finally back at work in his secretive Whitehall role assessing the work of MI5 and MI6, the cause of the spymaster’s near-fatal collapse remains a mystery.

Last week, Mr Allan, Downing Street private secretary to both John Major and Tony Blair, and former permanent secretary at the Ministry of Justice and High Commissioner for Australia, refused to discuss what had happened to him.

Alex Allan

Back on his feet: Alex Allan strolling near his home

Until his illness, Mr Allan, 58, was fit and active and known as a keen runner, sailor and cyclist. But in July last year, weeks after he was appointed head of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), he was found unconscious at his West London home.

Blonde wildlife painter Dominique Salm, 36, who rents his late wife’s art studio in his home, told neighbours he was discovered with ‘blood everywhere’.

Her account added to speculation that Mr Allan may have been targeted by a foreign spy.

The JIC chief lapsed into a coma and was described as ‘very, very seriously ill’.

He was put under police guard in hospital while toxicology tests were carried out at his home.

Speculation focused on whether he had been targeted by terrorists or a hostile foreign government and questions were raised about his personal security.

Mr Allan’s wife, artist Katie Clemson, died of cancer aged 58 in 2007 and he continued to live in what was described as ‘an artist’s enclave’ on the Thames near Hammersmith.

He had also published his personal details on his own website, including his address, telephone number and details of family and friends.

However, Government officials tried to play down the investigation into his collapse, which was overseen by Scotland Yard’s Counter Terrorism Command.

No details of the police inquiry’s conclusions have ever been officially released, but Whitehall sources were quoted blaming it on pneumonia and insisted it was ‘non-suspicious’.

Despite security concerns, Mr Allan – who did not return to work until January – has also begun publishing further personal and professional details on the internet.

The short postings on Twitter reveal more details of his friends, where he spends the weekend, his travel arrangements and who he has been meeting as chairman of the JIC.

Yesterday his latest message said: ‘To Cowes for Civil Service Sailing Association regatta. No wind, but 25 boat fleet seem to have had a great week. Gave out prizes at dinner.’

The postings also reveal meetings with security delegations from a Singapore-based intelligence agency, a trip to look around the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, meetings at the Admiralty board room ‘with Nelson/ naval memorabilia. Semi-circle cut-out in table to fit stomach of former Board member’.

Last month, he flew to Washington ‘staying at ambassador’s residents (sic), meetings with all the usual suspects – including new appointments’.

Last week, at the Hampshire farmhouse where he is believed to have recuperated, his sister Jane said: ‘Alex is now fully recovered, back at work and living in London again.’

She refused to discuss what had been behind the illness.

A spokesman for the Cabinet Office said: ‘This is a private and personal matter. Alex Allan is back at work and fully recovered.’

Ex Met chief Sir Ian Blair cleared over £3m contracts to friends

Ex Met chief Sir Ian Blair cleared over £3m contracts to friends

By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 12:24 AM on 07th June 2009

Sir Ian Blair, the ex Metropolitan Police Commissioner

Controversial: Sir Ian Blair has been cleared of any wrong doing


Sir Ian Blair, the former Metropolitan Police chief, has been cleared of wrongdoing over £3million worth of business contracts the force awarded to his close friend and skiing partner.

The decision comes after a long-running inquiry by former Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Sir Ronnie Flanagan, into work given to a company owned by Andy Miller, a holiday companion of Sir Ian.

Sources last night confirmed that the report, to be handed to the Metropolitan Police Authority this week, would formally clear Sir Ian, who stepped down as Commissioner last year with a £1million pay-off.

Mr Miller’s company, Impact Plus, was hired to provide lucrative communications and IT systems for the force.

The inquiry began in July last year after it was claimed that Impact Plus was given one contract for £150,000 which another firm had allegedly offered to undertake for a third of the price.

The revelation led to concerns that Sir Ian’s 30-year friendship with Mr Miller amounted to a conflict of interest. Sir Ian denied any wrongdoing and co-operated fully with the inquiry.

Sir Ian, 56, announced an interest in Mr Miller’s company before a meeting to consider rival tenders for one Scotland Yard contract. But he then remained in the room during the decision-making process.

Concerns have also been raised about a contract to enhance Sir Ian’s public image. When the inquiry began Sir Ian said: ‘I consider that I was open and straightforward about my relationship with someone who was subsequently awarded a contract. I reject any suggestion that I have behaved inappropriately.’

A source close to Sir Ronnie last night said: ‘Nothing has been found that suggests Sir Ian did anything improper.’

Sir Ian will receive a lump sum pay-out of £672,000 and an index-linked pension of £126,000.

Sir Ian’s reign was dogged by questions about his judgment, leadership credentials and politically correct style of policing.

He faced personal criticism over the handling of the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, shot by armed officers under the false impression that he was a suicide bomber.

A Home Office spokeswoman said: ‘It is for the Metropolitan Police Authority, not the Home Office or Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, to comment.’

Last night a spokesman for the MPA confirmed it was still awaiting the report.

Wednesday, 3 June 2009


The 'tin-legged' ex-SAS man, the City PR and the £350,000 plot to sell MPs' secrets

By Jason Lewis
Last updated at 2:56 PM on 17th May 2009



A former Parachute Regiment major and an American-born City public relations man are key players behind the sensational leak of MPs’ expenses claims.

A Mail on Sunday investigation has uncovered their role in supplying computer disks containing MPs’ receipts, leading to a string of shattering revelations about politicians’ conduct.

Both acted as middlemen to negotiate the sale of the information, which they apparently obtained from another unknown source preparing it for the House of Commons authorities.
Henry

Links in the chain: Henry Gewanter with his wife Sue, pictured in 1992

Last night one of those involved claimed that they could now be made scapegoats by the Government and even feared arrest and ‘torture’.

The main conduit for the information is John Wick. He is a former soldier who is said to have served in the SAS and is now the boss of a London-based private security firm, and was directly involved in offering the computer disks to at least two newspaper groups.

Twice-married Mr Wick, 60, runs International Security Solutions Limited (ISSL), a firm specialising in helping shipping companies deal with the threat of piracy.

He is working with American-born PR man Henry Gewanter, who is known to have passed ‘samples’ of the expenses claims of individual MPs to several newspapers and allegedly asked for fees of up to £350,000, including up to £15,000 in cash just to view the material.

Neither man ever approached The Mail on Sunday.

Last night Mr Gewanter said: ‘The Government is fighting awful hard to suppress the truth about what they have been doing and I have taken a big risk, a personal risk, in bringing this story to light because it is the right thing to do.

‘If good people don’t stand up and do the right thing then the bad people get it all their own way all the time. That is not a good thing for anybody.’

How the pair first became involved in the affair is unclear, but it is believed to be linked to Mr Wick’s military background.

The House of Commons has recently employed former soldiers as ‘data controllers’ to prevent MPs’ personal information being leaked.

It would be ironic if the decision to beef up security in this way led to information being passed to Mr Wick.

Mr Gewanter, who once worked for Lord Bell, a key adviser to Baroness Thatcher when she was Prime Minister, confirmed he was acting for Mr Wick.

‘This story has not come about because of money or anything of that sort,’ said Mr Gewanter.

‘It involves very courageous people who have all taken very big risks in exposing this stuff to public scrutiny and it is incredibly important.’

He said that he and Mr Wick and the others involved now feared they would be ‘made to pay’ for the revelations, which have seen several senior politicians, including Ministers, suspended while their expenses claims are investigated.

Mr Gewanter said he and the others felt ‘a lot of pressure’ after suggestions that the police should be called in to find the moles and prosecute them.
Brian Goswell

Associate: Sir Brian Goswell, who was chairman of ISMG which collapsed with huge debts

He added: ‘There is a lot of bull about how “we have got to track them down because they having given away this private information and they could now sell it to criminals or terrorists for personal gain”.

‘But everybody involved in this has been very careful to protect the integrity and security of this information.’

Mr Gewanter said they now feared they would be arrested and even suggested they might be ‘tortured’.

He said: ‘There is a chain of people involved, and I understand that everybody is very keen to print my name or John’s name. The Government would like to catch one of us and waterboard the hell out of us until they can get the next one down the chain.’

Despite suggestions that those involved had demanded up to £350,000 for information about the expenses of all 646 MPs, Mr Gewanter said he had earned nothing from his role.

He refused to discuss the deal which saw The Daily Telegraph obtain disks containing copies of every receipt and expenses claim submitted by MPs in the past four and half years.

He said: ‘The real story in my view isn’t about individuals who have shown courage in exposing the misdeeds of public servants. The story is how elected officials have made rules to suit themselves and passed laws exempting them from tax when they steal money from us. They have been very badly behaved.

‘I have not had a penny for [my involvement in] this and it is driving me mad, taking [time] from my home life, my real business. My paying customers are going down the tubes.

‘I am an American. I was brought up there and I believe that a free Press is the most important and the only defence of our personal freedoms, our liberty and democracy.

‘This Government has been systematically cutting back on our freedoms, our liberty and democracy for some years. That is why I have done it and why I have done it for nothing.

‘Your Government seems to think that people like me are about to sell the stuff to criminals and terrorists and are undermining democracy, but I am not. I am exposing these people for what they are.’

He said his involvement would mean ‘a real serious problem. I’ll get deported or I’ll get locked up or they’ll make life miserable for me for ever’.

But he insisted that he and Mr Wick were acting for the public good and had done nothing wrong, adding: ‘No criminal acts have occurred. No criminal charges can be brought. I don’t deal in stolen goods. The stuff was not stolen. I know you don’t understand how that can be, but I can tell you it was not stolen.’

Mr Wick, meanwhile, failed to respond to several attempts by The Mail on Sunday to get him to explain his role.

He has employed many ex-military personnel and senior police officers as security consultants and it has been suggested that one of these contacts asked him to help sell information obtained from the House of Commons.

After 20 years as a security expert, Mr Wick has recently been beset by money problems.

His latest security firm was established at the end of last year after the collapse of another company, ISMG, with massive debts.

ISMG was wound up by liquidators last December after it was unable to pay nearly £400,000 it owed to creditors. Mr Wick is now desperately trying to rebuild his business.
Worthing

Home: Mr Wick's girlfriend's flat in Worthing, where he is thought to live

After the financial meltdown of his firm, which saw bailiffs arrive at its City offices over an unpaid rates bill, he was forced to give up his membership of the Carlton Club, the historic Conservative gentleman’s club, and has fallen out with several of his former business associates.

His personal circumstances also appear to have suffered. At one stage Mr Wick was living in a £1 million town house in London.

But his current address, registered at Companies House, is a £110,000 flat owned by his girlfriend Tania Hayes, a blonde dental nurse aged about 40, in a rundown Victorian conversion in Worthing, West Sussex.

Mr Wick is said to have expensive tastes. Last month he was planning a trip to Venice and inquiring about £225-a-head tickets for Musica a Palazzo, where guests can dine while they enjoy a selection of famous opera duets sung at their tables.

He has also had to pay for two divorces. He has two grown-up daughters from his first marriage to Penelope, who still lives in Hereford, the military town where the SAS is based and where Mr Wick began his first security business.

More recently he was married to Fiona Antcliffe, a partner in the top public affairs firm Brunswick, who previously worked for former Tory MPs the late George Gardiner and Sports Minister Colin Moynihan, now Lord Moynihan, at the House of Commons.

Sir Brian Goswell, a respected City figure in the property and construction industry, was chairman of ISMG.

Sir Brian, who was close to Margaret Thatcher and helped to fund Michael Portillo’s Commons office, said last night: ‘John Wick is a military man. He told me he had steel pins inserted in his legs after a parachute accident while he was in the SAS. What he is not is much of a businessman.

‘I am not used to being involved with a firm that collapses and is unable to pay its debts. John Wick has listed me as a consultant with his new company and he rings me from time to time, but I do not have much to do with him now.’

Mr Wick’s co-director in ISSL is Oliver Prior, a semi-retired Lloyd’s broker and non-executive director of Oxus Gold, a mining company which was involved in a political storm when the then Prime Minister Tony Blair intervened on its behalf when it lost gold mining licences in Kyrgyzstan, the former Soviet republic.

Asked about Mr Wick’s involvement in selling the MPs’ expenses data, Mr Prior said: ‘It would not surprise me – that is the sort of deal John specialises in.

‘He is very well connected but he has not told me about it. As far as I know he is in Greece working on something connected to his anti-piracy work. We supply security advice and trained military personnel to protect ships from pirates and I think that is what he is doing. I am not due to see him until later this month.’

Others listed as consultants on ISSL’s website include a former detective chief inspector and Michael Chandler, the ex-chief investigator of the UN Security Council’s Taliban and Al Qaeda monitoring group.

According to Companies House, Mr Wick has previously employed two former Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Peter Imbert and Sir David McNee, as directors of his various firms.

Mr Wick failed to respond to messages sent via email, left on his mobile phone and at his office, a serviced building, where meeting rooms can be rented by the hour, near the Bank of England.

But following our approaches, on Friday The Mail on Sunday was contacted by Mr Gewanter.

Asked about Mr Wick’s and Mr Gewanter’s roles last night, a spokeswoman for the Daily and Sunday Telegraph refused to comment.

The Men Behind the Leak of MPs Expenses.

Mole who blew whistle on MP expenses is a 'swashbuckler' with a £7million trail of debt
By Jason Lewis


Last updated at 9:04 AM on 24th May 2009




John Wick

Pariah: Expenses mole John Wick is being disowned by business associates


The former SAS officer behind the disclosure of MPs' expenses claims has left a trail of bad debts from a succession of failed businesses, The Mail on Sunday has discovered.

Twice-married John Wick, who claims to be close friends with a number of Tory grandees whom he refuses to name, has said his decision to sell the sensational documents was motivated by a sense of public duty.

The 60-year-old has also said he wants to highlight MPs' 'ongoing abuse of taxpayers' money' - even though his own ventures have left thousands of pounds in unpaid tax.

His money problems suggest he badly needed the reputed £100,000 he was paid for the Commons expense claims, which were originally touted to newspapers - not including The Mail on Sunday - for up to £350,000.

Our investigation has revealed that:

  • Mr Wick has left a string of 16 collapsed businesses behind him, with debts totalling more than £7million.
  • His failed business ventures have left former military comrades tens of thousands of pounds out of pocket.

A former Metropolitan Police Commissioner who briefly served on the board of one of Mr Wick's companies has distanced himself from the businessman, calling him a 'swashbuckling sort of a man' whom he did not trust.

The debts Mr Wick left include a string of unpaid bills, such as £34.56 from his milkman, £195.61 for a water cooler - and £35 from the Shangri-La guest house in Whitley Bay.

But Mr Wick has a reputation for 'phoenixing' - a term used when businesses collapse and then start up again under a new name within weeks.

He set up his current firm, ISSL, a small City-based private security business, shortly after he was discharged from an IVA, a legal device designed to stave off bankruptcy, in June 2007.

The IVA - individual voluntary arrangement - meant he had been able to continue in business while paying his creditors a proportion of his debts over a five-year period.

Mr Wick spent last week trying to reassure business contacts that his role as the key mole behind the release of MPs' expenses, as disclosed by The Mail on Sunday, would not damage their commercial activities.

ISSL is involved in insuring against kidnap and ransom and in providing cover for ship owners facing the threat of piracy.

Mr Wicks, a former SAS Major, told one contact, a publicity-shy insurance broker at Lloyd's of London, that the expenses affair would 'blow over soon'.


A succession of Mr Wick's firms have built up large debts before being forced into liquidation or referred to the official receiver, and then reopened under a slightly different name, often using the same premises and the same telephone numbers.

According to Companies House, Mr Wick has had 16 businesses dissolved since he set up his first company after leaving the Army in the mid-Eighties.

In 2006 four firms he ran were wound up with combined debts of nearly £5million. The biggest debtor was International Security Management Company, which owed £1.9million, including unpaid hotel bills, debts for computer equipment, the bill from his milkman and another £41.10 for 'fresh ground coffee'.

One of his business partners, Brian Wilde, who served with him in the Parachute Regiment, lost £47,000 which he hoped to use to fund his retirement. Another former military man, ex-Navy officer John Pitt, lost £90,000.

In 2008, another of Wick's companies, ISMG Ltd, was wound up with £375,000 debts. In February this year Intelligence and Security Solutions was wound up in a deal with creditors who were owed £218,000. In the same month ISS Group was shut down owing £134,000.

Previous Wick companies have suffered a similar fate. In 2001, WFE (UK) Ltd, a firm specialising in protecting international freight, was wound up by the courts with £1.09million debts.


Penny Wick

'Upset': Mr Wick's ex-wife Penny is said to want to distance herself and their daughters from his exploits


Another firm left a further catalogue of unpaid bills with guest houses and hotels, including the Coach and Horses in Hexham (£363.95), the Grosvenor Hotel, Jesmond, Newcastle (£50), and the Shangri-La Guest House in Whitley Bay (£35).

Even a firm set up by Mr Wick and his first wife Penny to renovate houses in the Nineties made losses of £100,000 in its last year of trading.

But last week, despite the continuing furore over MPs' expenses, Mr Wick was still doing business with big insurance companies, operating from the same serviced office used by some of his previous collapsed firms, with the same phone number.

At a meeting with worried insurance underwriter Guy Northam in a coffee bar near Lloyd's of London last week, Mr Wick tried to emphasise that his revelations were in the public interest and 'would not damage their business'.

Speaking openly in front of other customers at the cafe, he said: 'I think this will go away soon but I don't think it can damage us. We did it for the right reasons.'

In response to questions from Mr Northam, Mr Wick said the money he had made selling the details of MPs' expenses, reputed to be £100,000, was needed to 'cover possible legal bills'.

There has been speculation that the disclosures were politically motivated as they have been particularly damaging to Labour, sparking the suspension of several Government Ministers and causing Commons Speaker Michael Martin to resign.

Mr Wick's second wife, Fiona Ancliffe, is a senior partner in Brunswick, the leading public affairs firm, and had previously worked for senior Tory MPs at Westminster.

He is an associate of Sir Brian Goswell, a senior Tory backer who was close to Margaret Thatcher, and he is also an ex-member of the private Carlton Club for Tory grandees.

Mr Wick and Ms Ancliffe were divorced seven years ago, with Mr Wick then moving into a house with a 25-year-old 'blonde researcher' from his firm. The woman, who was half his age, became a director and shareholder of several of his firms.

Mr Wick told Mr Northam that as a Tory supporter he had been 'disappointed' by some of the revelations about politicians from the party.

He added that the 'unfortunate' revelation Tory MP Sir Peter Viggers had paid for a 'duck island' using public money 'was not funny' and 'shows the party in a very bad light'.

Mr Wick went into business after his military career was curtailed by a training injury that left him with one leg shorter than the other.

He joined the Army in 1975 and graduated from Sandhurst. His first posting was with the Royal Army Ordnance Corps, where contemporaries say he was 'disappointed' to be given command of the regiment's Mobile Bath Unit that provided wash facilities for troops in the field.

No doubt looking for a more exciting role, Mr Wick transferred to the Parachute Regiment and was promoted to Acting Major. After a stint in Whitehall, he transferred again to join the elite ranks of the SAS.

Several former business associates of Mr Wick mistakenly believed that he was involved in the SAS's audacious rescue of hostages at the Iranian Embassy in London in 1980, but he was not. Either shortly before or shortly after the siege, Mr Wick left the Army because of injuries.

Accounts of his injury vary. Some former colleagues say he was hurt in a 'halo jump' - when a parachutist opens his chute at a low altitude after a long free-fall. Others say he was undergoing 'building entry drill' when he fell from a high ladder.

Several of Mr Wick's business associates now seem keen to distance themselves from the affair.

Multi-millionaire underwriter Rupert Villers, one of the most powerful figures in the London insurance market, said he was no longer involved with Mr Wick. A spokeswoman for his firm Aspen said: 'Mr Villers' association with John Wick is related to a previous personal business relationship, which does not relate to his current role at Aspen.'

Mr Wick tried to use two former Metropolitan Police Commissioners, Lord Imbert and Sir David McNee, as 'referees' as he attempted to explain his role in the expenses affair. He said in an interview yesterday that 'several former commissioners of the Metropolitan Police have served on the board of my companies'.

But Lord Imbert, who was a director of one of Mr Wick's firms in the Nineties, said he was 'unhappy' his name was being used.

He told The Mail on Sunday: 'I am very unhappy he is using me in this way, trying to give himself credibility.

'I worked for him for a short time but left because I felt very uncomfortable about the way he did business. He was a swashbuckling sort of man who told people what they wanted to hear, but failed to deliver.

'He wanted my name on his letterhead but I did not like the way he did business. I did not trust him.'

Friends of Mr Wick's first wife, Penny, suggested she, too, wanted to distance herself and their two daughters from her ex-husband's exploits.

She declined to comment from the home in Hereford she once shared with Mr Wick, but sources said: 'I understand she is upset that this has brought a lot of unwanted attention upon her and her whole family. John has nothing to lose and everything to gain, but his daughters do not.'

Henry Gewanter, the American-born publicist who helped Mr Wick market the expenses material, refused to answer detailed questions about Mr Wick's business affairs.

He said: 'Mr Wick has nothing to say to you. What he will say is he is proud of his service to the country both in his military career and in his recent actions in bringing Parliament to public scrutiny.'